مطالعات رفتار سازمانی

مطالعات رفتار سازمانی

تاثیر قراردادهای نامتعارف بر عملکرد نوآورانه: تحلیل نقش میانجی دلبستگی شغلی و توانمندسازی روانشناختی (مورد مطالعه: شرکت های هواپیمایی ایران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
عادل آذر 1
مهدیه ویشلقی 2
1 استاد گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری ،دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان
چکیده
عملکرد نوآورانه عامل مهم و حیاتی برای خلق ارزش و دستیابی به مزیت رقابتی پایدار در محیط‌های پیچیده امروزی است. شرکت‌ها با عقد قراردادهای نامتعارف و ایجاد شرایط منعطف کاری زمینه را برای عملکرد نوآورانه کارکنان فراهم می‌سازند. هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تاثیر قراردادهای نامتعارف کاری بر عملکرد نوآورانه کارکنان با درنظرگرفتن نقش میانجی‌ دلبستگی شغلی و توانمندسازی روانشناختی است. روش پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر نحوه جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، کارکنان پنج شرکت هواپیمایی ایران هستند. برمبنای نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای تصادفی، 314 پرسشنامه صحیح عودت داده شد و با استفاده از نرم-افزارهای SPSS و AMOS داده‌های پژوهش مورد تجزیه‌و‌تحلیل قرار گرفتند. برای سنجش متغیرهای پژوهش از پرسشنامه قراردادهای نامتعارف کاری روزن و همکاران (2013)، دلبستگی شغلی شائوفلی و همکاران (2006)، توانمندسازی روانشناختی اسپریتزر (1995) و عملکرد نوآورانه وانگ و احمد (2004) استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد قراردادهای نامتعارف کاری بر عملکرد نوآورانه کارکنان تأثیر مستقیم و معناداری دارد و به طور غیرمستقیم از طریق میانجی‌گری دلبستگی شغلی و توانمندسازی روانشناختی بر عملکرد نوآورانه کارکنان تأثیر معناداری دارد. نتایج پژوهش در حوزه قراردادهای نامتعارف حاکی از آن است که مدیران شرکت‌های هواپیمایی با ارائه بسته‌های متناسب‌سازی شده همچون پرداخت حقوق و مزایای بیشتر، ارتقا کارکنان در مسیر پیشرفت شغلی، برگزاری دوره‌های آموزشی و ... منجربه افزایش دلبستگی شغلی و توانمندسازی کارکنان و نهایتاً عملکردخلاقانه و نوآورانه کارکنان ‌میشوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
قراردادهای نامتعارف
عملکرد نوآورانه
دلبستگی شغلی
توانمندسازی روانشناختی
شرکت های هواپیمایی ایران
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Impact of Idiosyncratic Deals on Innovative Performance: Analysis of the Mediator Role of Work Engagement and Psychological Empowerment: (Case study: Airlines)

نویسندگان English

adel azar 1
mahdieh vishlaghi 2
1 Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. Candidate. Public Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University
چکیده English

Innovative performance is a vital factor in creating value and achieving sustainable competitive advantage in today’s complicated world. Companies pave the way for the innovative performance of their employees by drawing up idiosyncratic deals and creating flexible working conditions. This study aims to examine the effects of idiosyncratic deals on the innovative performance of employees while taking into consideration the mediating role of work engagement and psychological empowerment. This study is of applied type in terms of its goal, and it is a descriptive and correlational study in terms of the data collection method. The statistical population of the study consists of the staff working at five Iranian airlines. Finally, 314 questionnaires filled with accurate answers were submitted based on stratified random sampling. The collected data of the study were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software. The questionnaires of idiosyncratic deals designed by Rosen et al. (2013), work engagement designed by Schaufeli et al. (2006), psychological empowerment designed by Spreitzer (1995), and innovative performance designed by Wang & Ahamd (2004) were used to assess the research variables. Idiosyncratic deals have a direct significant impact on employees’ innovative performance. They have an indirect significant effect on employees’ innovative performance through the mediation of work engagement and psychological empowerment. The results of the research in the field of idiosyncratic deals and innovative performance have introduced some innovations. The results of research in the field of idiosyncratic work deals indicate that the managers of airlines by offering tailored packages such as paying more salaries and benefits, promoting employees on the path to career advancement, holding training courses, etc., lead to an increase of Job engagement and employee empowerment and ultimately creative and innovative performance of employees.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Idiosyncratic Deals
Innovative Performance
Psychological Empowerment
Work Engagement
Iranian Airlines
  1. ابراهیمی، الهام (1399)، بررسی تأثیر قراردادهای نامتعارف بر ابعاد عدالت سازمانی ادراک‌شده: نقش تعدیل­گر مبادله رهبر – پیرو، فصلنامه مطالعات رفتار سازمانی، دوره نهم، شماره 4(36): 95-123.
  2. ابراهیمی، الهام (1401)، معاملات غیرمتعارف و غنی­سازی کار و خانواده؛ نقش تعدیل‌گر خودکارآمدی، فصلنامه مدیریت بهره­وری، دوره 16، شماره 1(60): 251-227.
  3. Aggarwal, A., Chand, P. K., Jhamb, D., & Mittal, A. (2020). Leader–member exchange, work engagement, and psychological withdrawal behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00423
  4. Bal, P. M., De Jong, S. B., Jansen, P. G., & Bakker, A. B.(2012). Motivating employees to work beyond retirement: A multi-level study of the role of I-deals and unit climate. Journal of Management Studies, 49(2), 306-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01026.x
  5. Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of innovation: Role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 928-951. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.651313
  6. Boudrias, J. and brunet, L; Savoie, A. and Plunier, P, (2010), Empowering Employees: The moderating role of perceived organizational climate and justice, Canadian Journal of Behavioural science, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2010, pp.201-211.
  7. Caliskan, E.,& Torun, A. (2019). Individualized HR practices and idiosyncratic deals (I-deals) and the expected positive individual and organizational outcomes. Istanbul Business Research, 48(1), 36-63. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0016
  8. Cefis, E., Marsili, O., & Rigamonti, D. (2019). In and out of balance: Industry relatedness, learning capabilities and post‐acquisition innovative performance. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 210-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12441
  9. Cheng, T., Zhang, P., Wen, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Social media use and employee innovative performance: Work engagement as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 48(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8698
  10. Cooke, F. L., Cooper, B., Bartram, T., Wang, J., & Mei, H. (2019). Mapping the relationships between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: A study of the banking industry in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1239-1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1137618
  11. Côté, K., Lauzier, M., & Stinglhamber, F. (2021). The relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction: A mediated moderation model using work engagement and perceived organizational support. European Management Journal, 39(2), 270-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.001
  12.  
  13. Dust, S. B., Resick, C. J., Margolis, J. A., Mawritz, M. B., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee success: Examining the roles of psychological empowerment and emotional exhaustion. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 570-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.02.002
  14. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual review of sociology, 2(1), 335-362
  15. Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of Management, 31(5), 758-775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279370
  16. Goetz, N., & Wald, A. (2020). Employee performance in temporary organizations: The effects of person‐environment fit and temporariness on task performance and innovative performance. European Management Review, 18(2), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12438
  17. Gupta, v., Singh, s., & Bhattacharya, a. (2017). The relationships between leadership, work engagement and employee innovative performance: Empirical evidence from the Indian r&d context. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(07), 1750055. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919617500554
  18. Hir, Joseph. Holt, Thomas. Ringle, Christine. Sarstad, Marco (2017). Modeling of structural equations of least squares (PLS-SEM). Translation: Azar, A, Gholamzadeh, R. Knowledge Look Publications. Tehran.
  19. Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Weigl, M., Müller, A., & Glaser, J. (2014). Redesigning work through idiosyncratic deals. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 608-626. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2012.740171
  20. Huang, Y., & Chen, X. (2021). A moderated mediation model of idiosyncratic deals and innovative performance of R&D employees: Roles of vitality. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-09-2020-0417
  21. Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., Nasim, A., & Khan, S. A. (2020). A moderated-mediation analysis of psychological empowerment: Sustainable leadership and sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121429
  22. Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Haque, A. U., & Rubab, U. (2019). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 15780. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.15780abstract
  23. Jimenez-Jimenez, D., Sanz-Valle, R. and Hernandez-Espallardo, M. (2008). Fostering innovation: The role of market orientation and organizational learning. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11( 3), 389- 412.
  24. Kafouros, M., Love, J. H., Ganotakis, P., & Konara, P. (2020). Experience in R&D collaborations, innovative performance and the moderating effect of different dimensions of absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119757
  25. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engage-ment and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
  26.  
  27. Katou, A. A., Budhwar, P. S., & Patel, C. (2020). Idiosyncratic deals in less competitive labor markets: Testing career I-deals in the Greek context of high uncertainties. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1759672
  28. Khan, Jabran; Jaafar, Mastura; Javed, Basharat; Mubarak, Namra; Saudagar, Tahira (2020). Does inclusive leadership affect project success? The mediating role of perceived psychological empowerment and psychological safety. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 1077–1096. doi: 10.1108/ijmpb-10-2019-0267 
  29. Kim, M., & Koo, D. (2017). Linking LMX, engagement, innovative behavior, and job performance in hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(12), 3044-3062. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-06-2016-0319
  30. Kimwolo, A., & Cheruiyot, T. (2019). Intrinsically motivating idiosyncratic deals and innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-05-2017-0038
  31. Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100704
  32. Lai, F. Y., Tang, H. C., Lu, S. C., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, C. C. (2020). Transformational leadership and job performance: the mediating role of work engagement. SAGE Open, 10(1), 2158244019899085.
  33. Lesener, T., Gusy, B., Jochmann, A., & Wolter, C. (2020). The drivers of work engagement: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal evidence. Work & Stress, 34(3), 259-278.
  34. Liao, C., Wayne, S. J., & Rousseau, D. M. (2016). Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(59), S9-S29. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1959
  35. Liu, J., Lee, C., Hui, C., Kwan, H. K., & Wu, L. (2013). Idiosyncratic deals and employee outcomes: The mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 832-840. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032571
  36. Liu, F., & Zhou, K. (2020). Idiosyncratic deals and creative deviance: The mediating role of psychological entitlement. R&D Management, 22(03), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12430
  37. Malik, M., Sarwar, S., & Orr, S. (2021). Agile practices and performance: Examining the role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Project Management, 39(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.09.002
  38. Monica, R., & Krishnaveni, R. (2019). Enhancing innovative work behaviour through work engagement: Examining the role of psychological empowerment and social support. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 20(4), 527. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2019.103323
  39.  
  40. Moye, M. J., & Henkin, A. B. (2006). Exploring associations between employee empowerment and interpersonal trust in managers. Journal of Management Development, 25(2), 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610645108
  41. Ng, T. W., & Lucianetti, L.(2015). Goal striving, idiosyncratic deals, and job behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2023
  42. Orth, M., & Volmer, J. (2017). Daily within-person effects of job autonomy and work engagement on innovative behaviour: The cross-level moderating role of creative self-efficacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 601-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2017.1332042
  43. Radic, A., Arjona-Fuentes, J. M., Ariza-Montes, A., Han, H., & Law, R. (2020). Job demands–job resources (JD-R) model, work engagement, and well-being of cruise ship employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102518
  44. Rai, A., & Maheshwari, S. (2020). Exploring the mediating role of work engagement between the linkages of job characteristics with organizational engagement and job satisfaction. Management Research Review, 44(1), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-10-2019-0442
  45. Rousseau, D. M, Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006). I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977-994. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527470
  46. Rousseau, D. M., Hornung, S., & Kim, T. G. (2009). Idiosyncratic deals: Testing propositions on timing, content, and the employment relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.02.004
  47. Rousseau, D. (2015). I-deals: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. Routledge.
  48. Rosen, C. C., Slater, D. J., Chang, C., & Johnson, R. E. (2013). Let’s make a deal. Journal of Management, 39(3), 709-742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394865
  49. Sandhya, S., & Sulphey, M. (2019). An assessment of contribution of employee engagement, psychological contract and psychological empowerment towards turnover intentions of IT employees. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijewe.2019.097186
  50. Sandri, P., & Widodo, W. (2020). Innovative performance development model based on human capital and network quality toward improved marketing performance. Management Science Letters, 659-664. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.9.013
  51. Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González–Romá, V. & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
  52. Shams, M. S., Mei, T. S., & Adnan, Z. (2021). Nexus between idiosyncratic deals and work engagement via psychological empowerment: A PLS-SEM approach. Management Science Letters, 11(1), 689-698. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.037
  53. Sharma, N., & Singh, V. K. (2018). Psychological empowerment and employee engagement. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 9(4), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijhcitp.2018100103
  54. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
  55. Teo, S. T., Bentley, T., & Nguyen, D. (2020). Psychosocial work environment, work engagement, and employee commitment: A moderated, mediation model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102415
  56. Villajos, E., Tordera, N., & Peiró, J. M. (2019). Human resource practices, Eudaimonic well-being, and creative performance: The mediating role of idiosyncratic deals for sustainable human resource management. Sustainability, 11(24), 6933. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246933
  57. Wang, C., & Chen, H. (2020). Relationships among workplace incivility, work engagement and job performance. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 3(4), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhti-09-2019-0105
  58. Wang, S., Liu, Y., & Shalley, C. E. (2018). Idiosyncratic deals and employee creativity: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Human Resource Management, 57(6), 1443-1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21917
  59. Wang, L., & Long, L. (2018). Idiosyncratic deals and taking charge: The roles of psychological empowerment and organizational tenure. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(9), 1437-1448. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7084
  60. Wang. P., Wang. S., Yao. X., & Hsu. I., (2019). John Lawler5, Idiosyncratic
    deals and work-to-family conflict and enrichment: The mediating roles of fit perceptions and efficacy beliefs, Human Resource Management Journal, 29(4), 600-619.
  61. Xu, J., Xie, B., & Chung, B. (2019). Bridging the gap between affective well-being and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of work engagement and collectivist orientation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224503
  62. Yang, X. (2020). Review of idiosyncratic deals in organization: From the dual perspective of “I-dealers” and “Co-workers”. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10(03), 645-658. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2020.103043
  63. Zulfiqar, A. (2019). The role of knowledge sharing and organizational memory on employees’ innovative work behavior through psychological empowerment. Journal of Commerce and Management Thought, 10(4), 420. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-478x.2019.00028.4
  64.