مطالعات رفتار سازمانی

مطالعات رفتار سازمانی

شناسایی پیشایندهای عملکرد انطباقی کارکنان با رویکرد فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه پیام نور واحد تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
نوسانات محیطی و تغییرات پرتلاطم روزافزون، اهمیت توانمندی کارکنان در مواجهه با شرایط مختلف و محیط­های نامطمئن را مضاعف نموده است. دیدگاه­های پیشین درخصوص عملکرد کارکنان، جای خود را به عملکرد انطباقی کارکنان برای مواجهه با محیط­های نامطمئن و پویا بخشیده است. هرچند مطالعات متعددی درخصوص عوامل مؤثر بر عملکرد انطباقی کارکنان صورت پذیرفته است، اما هدف این پژوهش، ارائه یک تحلیل جامع از پیشایندهای عملکرد انطباقی کارکنان است. این پژوهش ازنظر رویکرد، یک پژوهش کیفی بوده و از روش پژوهش فراترکیب استفاده کرده است. داده‌ها از 34 پژوهش پیرامون عملکرد انطباقی کارکنان که در دوره زمانی 1999 تا 2017 منتشر شده بودند، گردآوری شده است. به­عنوان یافته­های پژوهش، ضمن طبقه­بندی تعاریف مربوط به عملکرد انطباقی، پیشایندهای آن درقالب 58 کد، 15 مضمون سازنده و 4 مضمون فراگیر شامل عوامل فردی، عوامل سازمانی، عوامل شغلی و عوامل گروهی شناسایی و طبقه­بندی شدند. ازلحاظ عملی نتایج این پژوهش با شناسایی پیشایندهای فردی، شغلی، گروهی و سازمانی مؤثر بر عملکرد انطباقی به مدیران سازمان­ها کمک می‌کند تا در شناخت اقدامات اثربخش هنگام مواجهه با تغییرات و موقعیت­های نامطمئن، بهتر عمل کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Identifying Employees' Adaptive Performance Antecedents by Meta-Synthesis

نویسندگان English

hamid taboli 1
mohammad montazeri 2
mahboobeh askari bagher abadi 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran Branch,
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
3 PhD Student in Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Environmental fluctuations and turbulent changes have doubled the importance of employees' empowerment in facing with different situations and uncertain environment. Previous viewpoints about employees' performance have given their place to adaptive performance of employees to face uncertain and dynamic environments. Although there are many studies about effective factors on employee's adaptive performance, the purpose of this research is to present a comprehensive analysis of employees' adaptive performance. In terms of approach, this research is qualitative research and has been used meta-synthesis method. Data were collected from the 34 research on employees' adaptive performance published between 1999 and 2017. As results, while the definitions related to adaptive performance were classified, its antecedents were identified and classified in form of 58 codes, 15 constructive themes and 4 comprehensive themes including individual, job, group and organizational factors. Practically, the results of this study by identifying individual, job, group and organizational factors affecting adaptive performance help managers to perform better in identifying effective actions when faced with uncertain changes and situations.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Adaptive Performance
Adaptive Behavior
Adaptability
Meta-Synthesis
حیدری، مرضیه (1398)، رابطه اخلاق کار اسلامی با عملکرد انطباقی با نقش میانجی رفتار کار نوآورانه و نقش تعدیل‌گر رهبری اخلاقی، مجله توانمندسازی سرمایه انسانی، سال سوم، شماره چهار: 298-283.
فلاح، محمدرضا (1398)، ارائه چارچوبی برای بازتولید سرمایه اجتماعی با استفاده از رویکرد فراترکیب، مطالعات مدیریت (بهبود و تحول)، سال بیست‌وهشتم، شماره نود و سه: 203-161.
فلسفی، علی؛ معمارزاده، غلامرضا؛ الوانی، سیدمهدی و موسی­خانی، محمد (1399)، ارائه الگوی کرامت انسانی کارکنان در سازمان­های دولتی ایران با استفاده از روش فراترکیب، مطالعات مدیریت (بهبود و تحول)، سال بیست‌و‌نهم، شماره نود و هفت: 185-161.
مهداد، علی؛ حسام قاسمی، حسین و غفوری، محمدرضا (1398)، تأثیر وفاداری سازمانی و جاافتادگی سازمانی بر عملکرد انطباقی: نقش تعدیل‌گر وظیفه‌شناسی، فصلنامه مطالعات ‌رفتار‌ سازمانی، سال‌هشتم،‌ شماره اول: ‌92-7.
Reference
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of ManagementReview, 38, 132-153.
Bartone, P. T., Kelly, D. R., & Matthews, M. D. (2013). Psychological hardiness predicts adaptability in military leaders: A prospective study. International Journal of Selection andAssessment, 21, 200-210.
Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 67, 26-48.
Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29, 280-293.
Charbonnier-Voirin, A., Akremi, A. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35, 699-726.
Chaurasia, S., & Shukla, A. (2014). Psychological capital, LMX, employee engagement & work role performance. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 50, 342-356.
Chen, G., & Mathieu, J. (2008). Goal orientation dispositions and performance trajectories: The roles of supplementary and complementary situational inducements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 21-38.
Chen, G., Thomas, B., & Wallace, J. C. (2005). A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 827-841.
 
Chiaburu, D. S., Lorinkova, N. M., & Van Dyne, L. (2013). Employees’ social context and change-oriented citizenship: A meta-analysis of leader, coworker, and organizational influences. Group Organization Management, 38, 291-333.
De Lange, A. H., Van Yperen, N. W., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Bal, P. M. (2010). Dominant achievement goals of older workers and their relationship with motivation-related outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 118-125.
Denissen, J. J., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1285-1302.
Dorsey, D., Cortina, J., & Luchman, J. (2010). Adaptive and citizenship-related behaviors at work. In J. Farr & N. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection, New York, NY: Routledge.
Eldor, L., & Harpaz, I. (2016). A process model of employee engagement: The learning climate and its relationship with extra-role performance behaviors. Journal of OrganizationalBehavior, 37, 213-235.
Foss, N.J., &  Jensen, H. (2019). Managerial meta-knowledge and adaptation: governance choice when firms don't know their capabilities Strat. Organ, 17 (2),153-176
Ghitulescu, B. E. (2013). Making change happen the impact of work context on adaptive and proactive behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49, 206-245.
Good, D. (2014). Predicting real-time adaptive performance in a dynamic decision-making context. Journal of Management & Organization, 20, 715-732.
Goštautaitė, B., & Bučiūnienė, I. (2015). The role of work characteristics in enhancing older employees’ performance: Evidence from a post-Soviet country. The International Journalof Human Resource Management, 26, 757-782.
Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2003). Adaptable behaviors for successful work and career. Adjustment Australian Journal of Psychology, 55, 65-73.
Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2004). Why openness to experience is not a good predictor of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 243-251.
Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2005). Are conscientious workers adaptable? Australian Journal of Management, 30, 245-259.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of ManagementJournal, 50, 327-347.
Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 174-182.
Han, T. Y., & Williams, K. J. (2008). Multilevel investigation of adaptive performance: Individual- and team-level relationships. Group & Organization Management, 33, 657-684.
Hauschildt, K., & Konradt, U. (2012). Self-leadership and team members’ work role performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27, 497-517.
Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos(Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, anddevelopment, San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Huang, J. I., Ryan, A. M., & Zabel, K. L. (2014). Personality and adaptive performance at work: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 162-179.
Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340-362.
Javed, B., Bashir, S., Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Arjoon, S. (2016). Islamic Work Ethic, innovative work behaviour, and adaptive performance: the mediating mechanism and an interacting effect. Current Issues in Tourism, 20, 647-663.
Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 984-996.
Joung, W., Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (2006). Using “war stories” to train for adaptive performance: Is it better to learn from error or success? Applied Psychology, 55, 282-302.
Jundt, D. K., Shoss, M. K., & Huang, J. L. (2015). Individual adaptive performance in organizations: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 53-71.
Kanten, P., Kanten, S., & Gurlek, M. (2015). The effects of organizational structures and learning organization on job embeddedness and individual adaptive performance. ProcediaEconomics and Finance, 23, 1358-1366.
Karaevli, A., & Hall, D. T. T. (2006). How career variety promotes the adaptability of managers: A theoretical model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 359-373.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Rench, T. (2009). Individual differences, adaptability, and adaptive performance: A conceptual analysis and research summary. Research Triangle Park, NC: Battelle Scientific Services.
Le Pine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. PersonnelPsychology, 53, 563-539.
Mc Loughlin, N., & Priyadarshini, A.(2021). Adaptability in the workplace: Investigating the adaptive performance job requirements for a project manager. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100012.
Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 585-600.
Marques-Quinteiro, P., Curral, L. A., & Passos, A. M. (2012). Adapting the revised self-leadership questionnaire to the Portuguese context. Social Indicators Research, 108, 553-564.
Marques-Quinteiro, P., Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Passos, A. M., & Curral, L. (2015). Measuring adaptive performance in individuals and teams. Team Performance Management, 21, 339-360.
Morgan, N. A., Zou, S., Vorhies, D. W., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2003). Experiential and informational knowledge, architectural marketing capabilities, and the adaptive performance of export ventures: A cross-national study. Decision Sciences, 34, 287-321.
Murphy, P. R., & Jackson, S. E. (1999). Managing work role performance: Challenges for twenty first century organizations and employees. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation and development, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Naami, A., Behzadi, E., Parisa, H., & Charkhabi, M. (2014). A study on the personality aspects of adaptive performance among governmental hospitals nurses: A conceptual model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 359-364.
Neal, A., Yeo, G., Koy, A., & Xiao, T. (2012). Predicting the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits. Journal of OrganizationalBehavior, 33, 175-192.
Niessen, C., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2016). Threat of resource loss: The role of self-regulation in adaptive task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 450-462.
Ogunfowora, B., Bourdage, J., & Lee, K. (2010). Rater personality and performance dimension weighting in making overall performance judgments. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 465-476.
Park, S., & Park, S. (2019). Employee adaptive performance and its antecedents: review and synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 3, 294- 324.
Ployhart, R. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2006). Individual adaptability (I-ADAPT) theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability. In C. S. Burke, L. G. Pierce & E. Salas (Eds.), Advances in HumanPerformance and Cognitive Engineering Research: Vol. 6. Understanding adaptability: Aprerequisite for effective performance within complex environments, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 85, 612-624.
Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Berman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. HumanPerformance, 15, 299-323.
Şahin, F., & Gurbuz, S. (2014). Cultural intelligence as a predictor of individuals’ adaptive performance: A study in a multicultural environment. International Area Studies Review, 17, 394-413.
Sandelowski, M., & Barros, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer publishing company Inc.
Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (2014). Adapting to rapid changes at work: Definitions, measures, and research. In D. Chan (Ed.), Individual adaptability to changes at work: New directions in research, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Schneider, B. (1990). The climate for service: An application of the climate construct. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schraub, E. M., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2012). The effect of change on adaptive performance: does expressive suppression moderate the indirect effect of strain? Journal of Change Management, 11, 21-44.
Sherehiy, B., & Karwowski, W. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of IndustrialErgonomics, 44, 466-473.
Shoss, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Vera, D. (2012). When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 910-924.
Smith, E. M., Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. In M. A. Quinones & A. Dudda (Eds.), Training for 21st centurytechnology: Applications of psychological research, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
Stewart, G. L., & Nandkeolyar, A. K. (2006). Adaptation and intraindividual variation in sales outcomes: Exploring the interactive effects of personality and environmental opportunity. Personnel Psychology, 59, 307-332.
VandeWalle, D. (2001). Goal orientation: Why wanting to look successful doesn’t always lead to success? Organizational Dynamics, 30, 162-171.
Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Song, Y., & Gong, Z. (2016). The different relations of extrinsic, introjected, identified regulation and intrinsic motivation on employees’ performance: Empirical studies following self-determination theory. Management Decision, 54, 2393-2412.
Zhang, S., Zhou, M., Zhang, J., & Chen, S. (2012). The nonlinear effects of conscientiousness on overall job performance and performance dimensions in the Chinese context. AsianJournal of Social Psychology, 15, 231-237.