Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly

Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly

Presenting a structural-interpretive model of aesthetic leadership in higher education

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
somayyeh zarei 1
nahid naderi bani 2
hassan zarei matin 3
1 Somayyeh Zarei. instructor. Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences. Payame Noor University.tehran. Iran
2 Assistant Professor. Management Group. Institute of hawzah and University. Qom. Iran.
3 university
Abstract
Presenting a Structural-Interpretive Model of Aesthetic Leadership in Higher Education

Aesthetic leadership is an approach based on emotional perceptions and implicit knowledge that accompanies them through emotional influence on employees. Aesthetic leadership is the perfect style for leading universities in the third millennium. Considering the importance of this issue in this study, it was tried to provide a model for aesthetic leadership in higher education of the country. The present study was conducted from a philosophical perspective based on interpretive paradigm. Also, in terms of the purpose of an applied-developmental research and from the perspective of data collection method, it is a descriptive research with cross-sectional survey method. The statistical population consisted of all experts of public universities who were sampled by snowball method and theoretical saturation was obtained with 13 people. The underlying categories of aesthetic leadership model were identified by themed analysis method and the relationships between the underlying categories of aesthetic leadership model were determined by structural-interpretive method. MaxQDA 20 software was used for themed analysis and structural-interpretive modeling calculations were performed using MicMac software. The findings showed that "mind and emotion leadership", "barriers to aesthetic educational leadership" and "aesthetic educational leadership strategy" had the greatest impact on aesthetic leadership. These elements influenced the "prevailing atmosphere in the university". The atmosphere at the university also influenced "individual capacities" and "organizational capacities". Similarly, these factors influenced "spiritual perspective and beautiful insight" and "beautiful educational behavior". Finally, the increase in "university adornment" led to "Beautiful University".
Keywords
Aesthetic leadership
higher education
exploratory mixed research design
Subjects
  1. آذر، عادل؛ خسروانی، فرزانه و جلالی، رضا (1398)، تحقیق در عملیات نرم، انتشارات سازمان مدیریت صنعتی.
  2. اسدیان، سیروس و عزیزی، قادر (1397)، تدریس مبتنی‌بر زیبایی‌شناسی: رویکردی جهت بهبود نگرش دانش‌آموزان به مدرسه، نوآوری‌های آموزشی، دوره هفدهم، شماره دوم: 73-96.
  3. پری‌پور، اعظم؛ ناطقی، فائزه و محمدی، مژگان (1399)، ارائه الگوی ارزشیابی کیفیت آموزش ترکیبی در آموزش عالی، پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی، چهاردهم، شماره پنجاه‌ویکم: 7-22.
  4. حاجی، مهدی (1398)، مقدمه‌ای بر زیبایی‌شناسی و تعالی سازمانی، تهران: انتشارات آتنا، چاپ دوم.
  5. حسن‌پور، علی (1399)، هنر و زیبایی‌شناسی در پدیدارشناسی هوسرل، متافیزیک، دوره سیزدهم، شماره سی‌ویکم: 1-18.
  6. رهنما، فریدون؛ شاهعلی، رامین و حیدرپور، فرزانه (1401)، نقش میانجی هوش هیجانی در رابطه رهبری اخلاقی با قصد هشداردهی خطاکاری در مؤسسات حسابرسی، دانش حسابداری، دوره سیزدهم، شماره چهل‌وهشتم: 31-58.
  7. شهبازی، محمد؛ توکلی، عبدل و کاظمی، سعید (1400)، بازآفرینی رهبری معنوی: الگویی مبتنی‌بر تعالیم اسلامی براساس کتاب شریف میزان‌الحکمه، مدیریت در دانشگاه اسلامی، دوره دهم، شماره بیست‌ویکم: 3-22.
  8. طوفان، شیدا (1400)، زیباشناسی سازمان و ساماندهی، دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی چالش‌ها و راهکارهای نوین در مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت و حسابداری، دامغان.
  9. عزیززاده، نادره؛ آقاموسی، رضا و آزاد، ناصر (1400)، ارائه الگوی رشد پویای سهم بازار ایران از تجارت منطقه‌ای گاز ازمنظر استراتژیک، مطالعات راهبردی سیاست‌گذاری عمومی، دوره یازدهم، شماره سی‌وهشتم: 257-275.
  10. فانی، مصطفی (1393)، زیباشناسی سازمانی به‌مثابه یک فرم، انجمن علوم مدیریت ایران، دوره نهم، شماره سی‌وپنجم: 145-177.
  11. فولادی، احمد و سعادتمند، زهره (1394)، مروری برتربیت زیبایی‌شناسی دردوره ابتدایی، سومین همایش علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی آسیب‌های اجتماعی و فرهنگی ایران، قم.
  12. محمدی، اصغر؛ شرفی، نورالدین و دهبان، اسماعیل (1400)، روندهای جدید در مدیریت دانش سازمانی، تهران: انتشارات نیاز دانش، چاپ دوم.
  13. معروفی، یحیی؛ یوسف‌زاده محمدرضا و کرمی، زهرا (1395)، نقش رویکرد برنامه درسی استادان در توسعه حرفه‌ای آنها و رضایت و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشجویان،توسعه حرفه‌ای معلم، سال اول، زمستان 1395، شماره 2.
  14. Agosto, V., & Westberry, G. (2020). The aesthetic pursuit of educational leadership for social justice: Grace in the struggle. Promoting Social Justice in Education, 21(3), 803-824.
  15. Animawan, A., & Koentjoro, K. (2021).Aesthetic Leadership Role on Indonesian public sector in Javanese Gamelan. Malaysian Journal of Music, 10(2), 1-12.
  16. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
  17. Barnes, B. (2015). Blending art with commerce to expand aesthetic leadership: Insights from steve Jobs and Jerry Garcia. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 20(3),92.
  18. Bathurst, R. (2010).Aesthetic leadership:managing fields of flow in art and business. Organization Management Journal,4(2), 170-174.
  19. Choi, Y. (2019). The mediating role of the aesthetic experience between transformational leadership and innovation. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1662630.
  20. Dangmei, J., & singh, A. (2017). How Aesthetic leadership style Might Relate to Employee Morale at Workplace ?An Analytical Study.Asia Pacific Journal of Research,1(1), 203-206.
  21. De Molli, F. (2021). Participatory interpretation: a way to overcome analytical challenges in organizational aesthetic research. Culture and Organization, 27(3), 226-239..
  22. Fragou, O., & Papadopoulou, M. (2020). Designing Infographics in a Higher Education context: content and aesthetics in a timeline layout. Open & Distance Education, 10(2), 33-43.
  23. Francis, H.(2020).Qualitative Study on the Aesthetic Perceptions of In-Service Elementary School Teachers. Wayne State University, 13(1), 242-265.
  24. Guven, E., & Polat, S.(2016).Aesthetic Leadership Perceptions of High School Students Regarding Their Teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies,4(11),109-118.
  25. Hansen, H., Ropo, A., & Sauer, E. (2007). Aesthetic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6),544-560.
  26. Holm, D. V., & Beyes, T. (2022). How art becomes organization: Reimagining aesthetics, sites and politics of entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 43(2), 227-245.
  27. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  28. Hughes, V. (2018). Authentic leadership: Practices to promote integrity. Journal of Christian Nursing, 35(2), 28-31.
  29. Ketelle, D., & Lin, B. (2019). Aesthetic Leadership and School Leadership Preparation: Cultivating Aesthetic Awareness Through an Arts-Based Leadership Development Curriculum. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 16(2), 6-18.
  30. Koehn, D. (2014). Aesthetics and business ethics. Springer.
  31. Kostera, M., & Wozniak, C. (2021). Aesthetics, organization, and humanistic management. Routledge, 125, 1-47.
  32. Mahoub, Y.M. (2016). The impact of arts education to enhance of aesthetiv sense ability for basic level puplis. Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(2), 126-130.
  33. Mannix, J., Wiikes, L., &Daly, J. (2015). Aesthetic leadership:its place in the clinical nursing world. Issues in mental health nursing, 36(5), 357-361.
  34. Mihas, P., & Odum Institute. (2019). Learn to Use an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Method Design for Instrument Development. SAGE Publications, Limited.
  35. Plester, B., Carroll, B., & Kim, H. (2019). Body Joking: The aesthetics and creativity of organizational humor. In Creativity and humor, 28(5), 129-142.
  36. Ramirez-Correa, P. E., Rondán-Cataluña, F. J., & Arenas-Gaitán, J. (2018). Student information system satisfaction in higher education: the role of visual aesthetics. Kybernetes,47(8), 1604-1622.
  37. Saeed , S., hossine, A, & Ghafar, A . (2013). Genderwise Perspective of Aesthetics on the Behavior of University Students. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 1(1), 19-23.
  38. San, K. N. S. S., & Ni, k. M.(2020). aesthetic leadership and teacher morale in basic education high schools.J. NasNoosh journal of leadership, 19(9A),137-150.
  39. Soner, P., & Zera, O. Z. K. (2011). Aesthetic leadership (AL): Development and implementation of aesthetic leadership scale (ALS) of the school directors. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(1), 50-61.
  40. Strati, A. (2000). The aesthetic approach in organization. The aesthetics of organization, 13(1), 21-39.
  41. Strati, A. (2010). Aesthetic understanding of work and organizational life: Approaches and research developments. Sociology Compass, 4(10), 880-893.
  42. Turan, F. K., & Cetinkaya, S. (2022). The role of aesthetics and art in organizational sustainability: A conceptual model and exploratory study in higher education. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 83-95.
  43. Zhang, H., Cone, M.H., Everett, A. M., & Elkin, G. (2011). Aesthetic leadership in hinese business: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Btaylorusiness Ethics, 101(3), 475-491.
  44.  
Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly
Volume 11, Issue 3 - Serial Number 43
Autumn
Autumn 2022
Pages 123-152